tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558957714655560952.post3855627491711522034..comments2023-10-23T10:00:26.775-07:00Comments on The Philosophy of Philosophy: Chris Tillmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07039880090804518326noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558957714655560952.post-58092836072909213662007-10-05T19:42:00.000-07:002007-10-05T19:42:00.000-07:00That seems right. I was thinking that he needs to...That seems right. I was thinking that he needs to know that everything is thinkable in order to know that when one thinks truly, what one thinks is what is the case.jamiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17145983128928370245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558957714655560952.post-82342814748082679012007-09-23T14:57:00.000-07:002007-09-23T14:57:00.000-07:00good post.with regards to your last comment, I don...good post.<BR/>with regards to your last comment, I don't think a mere logical possibility that McDowell's premise is wrong is enough to forbit him use of it. If that were true, nearly all premises in most of our arguments would be "illegal" (since the denial of most is logically possible).<BR/>Furthermore, I think there is some evidence of unthinkable things (such as things that can't be named).Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02122784992711602521noreply@blogger.com